December 6, 2009 | by MauritiusNews
India : Temple town reels under sex scandal

Police have arrested a 35- year- old priest after they got hold of a CD – which was selling like hot cakes – showing his sexual exploits inside the temple precincts…
For a town of a thousand temples, a sex scandal, that too one involving a priest, has come as a shocker. About 75km from Chennai and perched on the edge of the booming industrial hub of Sriperumbudur, Kanchee puram is yet to recover from the brazenness of 35- yearold Devanathan, who allegedly played out his “ unholy” acts in the sanctum sanctorum of the Maheswarar temple.

Police picked up the man in first week of November after they got hold of a CD showing his sexual exploits within the temple’s precincts. Copies of the CD had apparently sold like hot cakes in the town famous for its “ kancheevaram” silks.

With the media splashing salacious details of his relationships with a series of women, apparently from varied socioeconomic backgrounds, the issue continues to rock the local community which comprises weavers and families associated with the management of the temples that crowd its landscape.

With some of the women now accusing the priest of rape, the case which was initially based on obscenity was transferred on Tuesday from the town’s police force to the district crime branch for investigation.

Clearly, what’s made the incident sensational are its voyeuristic and exhibitionistic aspects which seem out of place in a small town known for its orthodox traditions.

Many more victims

Police say the priest allegedly threatened and sexually assaulted at least 30 women. Among the victims who approached the police is a 30- year- old woman, Malar ( name changed), wife of a school teacher, living close to the temple. She complained that priest had drugged her before raping her inside the temple.

She alleged that the priest had blackmailed her by recording footage of their sexual act on his mobile phone, and forced her to have sex with him on several occasions later. Malar accused the priest of threatening to tell her husband about the relation if she failed to “ co- operate” . The priest would apparently visit her house requesting for milk to do a puja, as a way of communicating his desire to meet her at the temple.

“ We have questioned Malar and recorded her statement,” Siva Kanchi police inspector S. Pattabiram told The Times of India . Following her revelations, the police booked the priest for rape on Monday. “ There are many more victims to be questioned. We will submit the case diary and statements recorded by the local police station in connection with the case to DCB officials formally in a couple of days, ” Pattabiram added. Devanathan, a father of two, has meanwhile been remanded in judicial custody and is now lodged in the Vellore prison.

The incident has sparked a sense of outrage among denizens of the temple town. S Mahesh, a member of a local activist group called the Kanchi Makkal Mantram, said his organisation condemned the incident and was planning “ a door- to- door campaign to distribute pamphlets to get more people to the streets to protest against the priest.” Other members of the outfit claimed the scandal had triggered off rumours about identities of other women, who were videographed by the priest.

Talk that CDs were being circulated in the town had caused much anguish. Manoharan, a resident of Siva Kanchi close to Maheswarar Temple, said, “ I have been living in the locality for more than eight years. We believe this temple is very powerful. Many women visit it. I have seen the priest distributing special puja ‘ prasadham’ to young women and girls.” Police are probing to check if the priest had video- recorded sexual acts with his victims and then handed them over to an accomplice running a video shop in Kancheepuram. His accomplice had allegedly made copies of CDs and circulated it in Kanchee puram and other areas.


  1. Vram says:

    where can I see more photos or videos of this priest sex scandle

  2. Trimurti says:

    Hinduism is full of obscenities. Hinduism is nothing more than vulgar love-making scenes between Radha and Krishna, worship of male organ in form of Shiva Linga, Vishnu and Shiva raping women, Mohini seducing Shiva, Brahma having relation with her daughter Saraswati etc etc

    Women in Hinduism’, the Vedas, Ramayana and Gita justify treating women as mere fuel for fire and an object for sexual gratification. As a result, the Ramyana and other `holy’ books seem to have verses that pop up conveniently so that the Gods can justify perverted sexual actions with animals, female relatives, and other men.

    Pornography is replete in the Ramayana, especially in the older unedited versions. The oldest Ramayanas are in fact Buddhist versions, and they preserve much of the true character of the vicious Rama and his adulterous wife Sita. Much of this material was later on deleted by the Brahmin crooks, so one must go to the older Ramayanas in order to uncover the truth. Thus, Dr. Charles claims that Ramayana contains much pornographic material and cannot be read in public. He gives the following examples:

    · Rama’s description of Sita’s beauty is lewdly detailed and full of obscene details (refer to C.R. Srinivasalyengar’s translation of Aranya Kandam – chapter 46).

    This shows the truly lecherous nature of Rama, who considered women as mere sexual objects.

    In Kiskind Kandam, the `great’ Rama of the `wonderful’ religion of Hinduism explains to Lakshmana in graphic details his sexual experience with Sita.

    This shows that Rama was a pornographer and lecher to boot. Not only did he seduce Sita, but had to tell the whole world about it! He viewed marriage simply as a means of fulfilment of base passions. The intelligence, her virtues and personality do not count.

    According to Ramayana, the Aryans (Brahmins) used to drink liquor (of nine different kinds), eat meat, marry many wives and prostitution was an accepted way of life amongst the priests and gods.

    This proves that, even during the Ramayanic era of the Brahmanic Dark Ages, the `noble’ Aryan Hindus lived in the manner of the animals with whom they shared the jungles.

    Ramayana also recounts the “story of King Dasharatha who, in order to have a baby son, made a big sacrifice (yagnam) of sheep, cattle, horses, birds and snakes. He then delivered his three wives Kaushaliya, Sumatirai and Kaikeyi to three priests. These holy men, having fully satisfied their carnal desire, returned the ladies to the King. By this means, the King was able to have three sons – Ram, Lakshman and Bharat” (Bala Kandam, Chapter 14. For more details on yagnam, refer to the book “Gnana Surian”, published by Kudi Arasu Press).

  3. Trimurti says:

    (continued )

    This shows the truly cheap nature of Rama’s immoral father. He was willing to prostitute his wives merely in order to gain personal benefits ! The `great king’ Rama’s father was merely a lowly pimp who handed his wives over to whosoever could fulfill his selfish needs!

    The handing over of Rama’s mother to the three disciples occurred after the Vedic horse sacrifice (ashwamedha), in which Rama’s mother copulated with the dead horse in accordance with Vedic Hindu requirements.

    This example shows the truly debauched nature of Rama’s whoring mother. Why did she have to have intercourse with a dead horse? Would not a living horse do?

    The Ramayan tells us much about the unlawful relationship of incest (Please refer to Aranya Kandam, chapter 45, verses 122, 123, 124 & 125). Incest is the prime speciality of Hinduism; thus Brahma had intercourse with his own daughter Sarasvati; and even Sita is, in the older Buddhist and more authentic versions of the Ramayana, the sister of Rama.

    One may ask, why are such perversions as incest, beastiality prevalent in Hinduism, and in fact sanctioned in Hindu scriptures? The answer is that the Brahmin imposed a strict sense of `brahmacarya’ (ascetism) onto a previously Aryan barbarian society. As a result, common Aryans could not satisfy their urges in normal and healthy manners and were thus forced to resort to perversions such as incest, zoophilia, etc.

    The following Hindu practices will reveal how immorality and indecency are sanctified in the name of Hinduism.


    Lingam and Yoni are the male and female sexual organs respectively. Hindus are allowed to worship anything – including sexual organs. It is not unknown for them to name their children Shiva Lingam (God Shiva’s sexual organ) or Rama Lingam (God Rama’s sexual organ). (In some places in Karnataka, the gods demand both male and females to pray naked together.)

    This practice is not so much a survival of pre-Brahmanic Saiva religion, but arose as a means of Brahmins ensuring a constant supply of lower-caste women to satisfy their lecherous needs. The Brahmins, who possessed absolute power over all other races, lived a life of constant debauchery, raping the non-Brahmin women and forcing them into prostitution.


    The Devadasi system was set up, according to a Times of India report (10-1 1 -87) as a result of a conspiracy between the feudal class (pseudo-secular word for `Rajputs’) and the priests (pseudo-secular word for `Brahmins’). The latter, with their ideological and religious hold over the peasants and craftsmen, devised a means that gave prostitution their religious sanction. Poor, low-caste girls, initally sold at private auctions, were later dedicated to the temples. They were then initiated into prostitution.

    Thus Devadasism is a system of legalised rape, enforced prostitution and sexual expoitation of Black Sudra women by Brahmin men. Moreover, by raping Sudra women the Brahmins could breed a new mixed race of middle castes which would serve to divide the Sudras !


    The Bharat Natyam is a dance performance which, because of the Brahmin media, has gained much recognition as a form of art. However, the origin of this dance lies in the Brahmins abducting low-caste women, raping them and forcing them to become prostitutes in order to earn money. As part of the captured womens’ training as `Devadasis’, they were required to learn the Bharatnatyam. The celebrated Bharat Natya expert, Rukmini Devi, admits in a National Geographic video programme, that the Baratha Natya was really the art of Devadasis (temple prostitutes) to please their audience and admirers. This is the reason why you might have seen various Baratha Natya’s postures in Hindu temples. The Bharat Natya helped the poor low-caste women who had been raped and incarcarated by the Brahmins, to attract customers and eke out a living. To top it all, the cunning Brahmins took most of her earnings too ! Maybe like the art of KARATE to the Japanese, the BHARAT NATYAM is a shameful national art of the Brahmins and very much part of their culture.

    Whilst Sudra women were shamefully exposed to the views of the lecherous Aryan male, the Brahmin females were locked up in a life of seclusion ! That is why Sudra women in Kerala were, down to the 20th century forbidden from wearing bodices or any form of upper body-garment which the Aryan women were forced to wear. The Sudra women thus had to appear top-less in order to satisfy the voyeuristic desires of the ogling Brahmin males !


    Brahminism has also created Kamasutra -a set of instructions on how to have sexual intercourse. Some of the postures detailed in Kamasutra are so complex that they can only be performed with the help of one or more ASSISTANTS!
    The Kamasutra was written in one of the Devadasi temples, those brothels where Sudra women were forced to a life of prostitution by their Brahmin captors. It is in these brothel-temples that Sanskrit, that hybrid mongrel language descended from the Old Indo-Aryan tribal tongues and the Sudric (Dravidian & Kolarian) languages.


    UNI. – TIMES OF INDIA – 10th Nov. 1987: confirms that the practice of dedicating young Harijan girls (Mahars, Mangs, Dowris and Chambhar) at childhood to a goddess, and their initiation into prostitution when they attain puberty continues to thrive in Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and other parts of South India. This is largely due to social backwardness, poverty and illiteracy, according to a study by two doctors of the India Health Organisation.

    The report clearly indicates that the Devadasi system was the result of a conspiracy between the feudal class and the priests (Brahmins), who with their ideological and religious hold over the peasants and craftsmen, devised a practice which acquired religious sanction. They noted in their study on – “Devadasis – the link between religious culture and child prostitution”.

    The study revealed that girls from poor families were sold after puberty at private auctions to a master who initially paid a sum of money to the families ranging from Rs. 500 to 5000.

    The study, made during health camps organised by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in the devadasi populated areas, revealed that the dedicated girls formed 15 percent of the total women involved in prostitution in the country, and as much as 70 percent to 80 percent of the prostitutes in the border districts of Karnataka and Maharashtra.

    This shows the extent to which the lecherous Brahmins raped and exploited the Negroid Sudra women of South India.

  4. Trimurti says:


    Many of the Yogis of Kashi (Banaras) live naked and beg for their living. They live in dirty, unhygienic conditions, and drug addiction is rife among them.
    Our so-called leaders and intellectuals have all contributed to the superstitious beliefs and they have helped these saints to thrive and practise deceptive methods to cheat the public. It is an utter shame that among the worshippers of such naked godmen, there are a number of high court judges, advocates, engineers, doctors, professors, politicians, cinema actors and actresses.


    AGENCIES News Agency reports on 23-9-87 that at Kurushetra (India) about 1,000 NAKED Hindu “Sadhus” (saints) plunged themselves into the river during a solar eclipse, claiming this to be a “holy dip”. Over one million pilgrims, naked and semi- naked, both male and female, also followed them into the river. The largest of the pools is Brahmasarovar, and is said to accommodate 100,000 bathers at a time. There was still no room for everyone in the water at one time and there was much pushing and shoving. The huge crowds waiting on the banks barely had space to turn around. People crowded the shore waiting for their chance. This is the position of “holy dip” everywhere in India. A Haryana Government spokesman said that they posted 20,000 policemen to avoid misuse of this mixing opportunity for perverted reasons.

    The reason why the Brahmins walk naked is that they could more easily force the lower castes to consume their urine and dung; the Brahmins could also more easily rape lower-caste women. Thus, when Brahmins walk along the road, they stop at intervals in order to relieve themselves, when their disciples immediately crowd around to obtain a piece of `holy’ excrement in order to consume it. If a Brahmin decides to copulate with any low-caste woman he sees, he immediately rapes her in public without any fear of retribution. These disorders were put down by the British in the bigger cities, but they continue in the rural countryside.

    For those who don’t know why the Brahmins forced the Sudras and other lower castes to consume dung and urine is that by this means, diseases and ailments would develop among the Sudras. Thus, the non-Brahmins would suffer from perpetual diseases and death. In addition, it reminded the Sudras of their `rightful and correct’ place in Hinduism – namely, as the animal slaves of the Brahmins. Maybe, even animals were treated better than Sudroids.

    In addition to this spectacle, the pilgrims also look directly at the sun with the naked eye. Scientists and doctors strongly advise against this as it is likely to cause blindness.

    The reason why the Brahmins encouraged the low-caste people to look at the Sun is that they desired to blind them into sightless slavery. Due to Brahmin brainwashing, a large fraction of the population became blind by staring at the Sun, thereby becoming further degraded in status and posing no threat to the evil Brahmanism.


    DPA News (6-1 1 -86) reports that Police have arrested a “miracle man” in the Western India city of Pune for raping a number of women, on the pretext of solving their troubles, by making them sit naked before an idol which was supposed to render “divine advice”. He would hold a blank sheet of paper over a fire on which written words would appear. He would then convince the women to have sex with him on the strength of the “miracle”. Police discovered that his “divine advance” was nothing but a simple chemical trick by which words written on paper with invisible ink became legible when held over a flame.


    According to the Hindu Holy books, God Brahma arranged the marriage of god Shiva to goddess Parvathi. When they went around the fire as per Hindu religious ritual, god Shiva looked at the thighs of goddess Parvathi and ejaculated his semen into the Fire and they became Rishis (priests). According to the Hindu Puranas this “god” can do such a filthy act !


    In many Hindu temples there are sculptures depicting men having sex not only with women but also cows. What is the meaning of this? Is not the cow sacred? If it is, then it should be worshipped not sexually assaulted!

    The answer is that the low-caste people were so frustrated because the Brahmins had abducted all their women as Devadasis that they had to satisfy their desires with cows. Whilst the Brahmins were busy raping their women, the Sudra men had to copulate with cows !


    The origin of the holiness of the cow in popular Hinduism is not quite certain. The Aryans loved to eat beef, though they seem to have admired the cow as a very useful animal. However, now the Hindu even goes to the extent of drinking the urine of the cow. How come?

    The reason why Hindus drink cow’s urine and eat cow-dung is that the Brahmins have enacted laws which force the non-Brahmins, especially the Sudroid Blacks, to eat not only cow-dung and drink cow-urine, but the urine and excreta of Brahmin males as well. These laws and customs show the abject depth to which the Brahmins had crushed the non-Brahmins. So lowly and animal-like was the status of the Sudras that they even had to consume the urine and dung of their Brahmin masters! Nowhere on the face of the earth, not even during the darkest days of slavery in the US South, or apartheid in South Africa, did a race of masters inflict a more dehumanising tyranny over a subject population.

    GOOD READING !!!!!!!!!!!

  5. Reality says:


    Incest, the practice of marrying one’s sister was very much prevailed in ancient India.

    Incest was common among several tribes of pre-Aryan India and is still found in various parts of the country. Thus, the marriage customs of the panchama baiga of central India permit the union of grandparents and grandchild, while the Ernadan male of Malabar takes his eldest daughter as his second wife.

    The Hindu levirate system, known as Noyoga, was a sort of incest, practiced for the sake of raising offsprings, though it appears to have been extended beyond legitimate bounds. As examples of incestuous marriages in Hindu mythology may be cited the union of Yama and Yami; Manu son of Vivasvat and his sister Sraddha; Prajapati and his daughter Ushas; Pushan and his sister Surya; Sukra and his THREE sisters; Suka and Pivari; Satrajita and his TEN sisters; Nahusha and his sister Viraja. Purukutsa’s queen Narmada after her husbands death, obtained a son through her own brother. Draupada may have married his own sister to obtain Dhrishtadymuna and Draupadi. Kaisalya wife of Dasaratha was probably also his sister; and more than one authority has suggested that Rama and Sita were actually brother and sister.

    Dr Sarkar thinks that the Rig-Veda furnishes rishi sanction (method) for the incestuous ties between a man and his sister, or even mother. The vedic rite called GOSAVA involved union with ones own mother, sister or female relative through which one secured entry into heaven. The Jaiminiya Brahmana relates that king Janaka of Videha, when he understood its (i.e. rituals) nature, refused to undertake the rite, but a Sibi king did perform it, acting out all the requirements.

    Certain episodes in the Epics point to an established dynastic custom among the Pandavas and Kauravas of sons succeeding to the seraglios of their father on his death, and it was apparently in keeping with ancient usage for princes to consort with all the father’s wides except their own mothers. Upadhya after citing several instances of incestuous practices among the ancient Indian people justly concludes, `In face of these numerous data, it futile to hold that incest is un-Vedic’. Whatever reasons the early Aryans had for despising the natives, they could not despise them on the score of their incestuousness.

    The promiscuity that permeated the later extremist Tantrik cults demanded incestuous relations with one’s sister, daughter, and mother, in antinomian rites that were believed to be especially pleasing to the goddess.

  6. Reality says:


    HINDU ABUSE OF WOMEN In order to permanently destroy the genetic stock of the non-Brahmin races the Brahmins enforced the depravities of child-marriage and incest upon the non-Brahmins. These customs led to genetic defects and mutations in the offspring as a result of consanginuity. Hence, incest is more common in Aryan Hindu society than in any other part of the world. References to this practice in ancient Indian literature abound. Often the girls were unwilling, but were then forced by their brothers-fathers to submit to the lecherous desires of the fanatic Aryan Hindu male. The strict Hindu, Buddhist and Jain emphasis on ascetism also played a role in the spread of this Hindu perversion. The main reason, however, was Brahmin imperialism. In addition to permanently degrading the genes of the non-Brahmins, this practice permitted the lecherous Brahmins to rape their daughters and hence help satiate their tremendous loveual apebreaste.

    References to incest abound even in the Rg Veda, showing that the perversion of brother-sister incest was introduced by the Aryan savages who invaded India :

    a.. `Lord’ Krishna lived in incest with his sister Subhadra, sharing her with his brother Balarama Mah.wh.153 . “In the festivals of that God Jagannath , the 3 images of Krishna, his brother Balarama, and his sister Subhadra, are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap reproaches upon Krishna, and upon his sister likewise, for having indulged in a criminal intimacy” Mah.wh 153 . Again, ” In the older tradition, Subhadra Krishna’s sister is said to have lived in criminal intimacy with both her brothers. This tradition is universally known and believed by the people in spite of the story of the marriage of Subhadra to Arjun ; and the Mussalmans frequently taunt the Hindus with the fact. The Pundits reconcile the stories by a fiction of there having been two Subhadras. As to Krishna’s proceedings, they are expalined away as Maya, or delusion.” — Mah.wh.153 b.. The Vedic Pushan is the lover of his sister Rg Ved VI.55.4 Apte 11 .

    No wonder so many Hindus have intercourse with their sisters ! c.. The Aryan God Agni is the lover of his own sister Rg Ved X.3.3 Apte 11 . A true model for all Aryans ! d.. Ashvins are referred to as the sons of Savitar and Ushas who are brother and sister Apte 11 .

    No doubt many pious Arya Hindus are the offspring of siblings. e.. The Ashvisns married Surya and Savitri who is their sister RV I.116.19 . f.. Agni is the son of his father and his sister Rg Ved.I.91.7 g.. Yama wards off his sister Yami, saying marriage between brother and sister is forbidden Rg.V.X.10 Apte 11 . This is the first indication that the Aryans had at least some moral sense ! However, this verse is evidently a later interpolation.

    Father-daughter incest occurs in the famous story of Prajapati (later identified with Brahma, in turn incorporated as an incarnation of Vishnu) and his daughter RV III.31.1-2 . Moreover, this act was punished. Prajapati is thought to have done something wrong, and Prajapati was pierced by Agni as a punishment Sat.Br. XIII.9 Apte 63 . This shows that a slight sense of wrongness of the deed did exist amongst the Aryan savages. However, it was, and still remains, a widely prevalent practice in Hindu society. The punishments meted out to the incestous gods are of little consequence and are probably later Brahmin fabrications designed to wash away the embarbutting episodes.

    It is evident that the strict laws on male-female relations led to the repression of normal practices and played a role in the rise of various perversions like brother-sister incest, father-daughter incest etc. Strict ascetism always leads to the rise of perversions.

    Even to this day incest of varying degrees (cross-cousin, father-daughter, mother-son, brother-sister, etc.) is extremely common amongst the Indo-Aryans. No other race on earth has ever recorded such a prevalance of this practice.

  7. Reality says:


    Brahma is the creator of the universe, Saraswati, who became the wife of her own father, was the daughter of Brahma. There are two stories about her genesis in the
    “Saraswati Purana”. One is that Brahma created his beautiful daughter Saraswati direct from his “vital strength” or seminal fluid. The other is that Brahma used to collect his semen in a pot whenever he masturbated fixing his carnal eyes on the celestial beauty Urvasi. Brahma’s semen in the pot gave birth to Saraswati. Thus,Saraswati had no mother.
    This daughter or grand-daughter of Brahma is the Hindu goddess of learning. When Brahma saw the beauty of Saraswati he became amorous. To escape from her father’s passionate approach Saraswati ran to the lands in all four directions, but she could not escape from her father. She succumbed to Brahma’s wish. Brahma and his daughter Saraswati lived as husband and wife indulging in incest for 100 years. They had a son Swayambhumaru. Swayambhumaru made love with his sister Satarpa. Through the incest of Brahma’s son and daughter Brahma got two grandsons and two grand-daughters.

    “Prajapati(Brahma) desired his daughter( SARASWATI) and made love to her. This was a sin in the eyes of the gods, who said to the god who rules over beasts [Pasupati, Rudra], ‘He commits a sin, acting in this way towards his own daughter, our sister. Pierce him.’ Rudra took aim and pierced him. Half his seed fell to the ground. The gods cured Prajapati and cut out Rudra’s dart, for Prajapati is the sacrifice. To utilize [the seed], the gods said, ‘Take care that this may not be lost, but that it may be less than the oblation.’ They gave it to Bhaga to eat, but it burnt his eyes and he became blind. Then they gave it to Pusan to eat, but it knocked out his teeth. At last they gave it to Savitr [the sun] and it did not injure him, for he appeased it.” —

    Ref : Satapatha Brahmana 1:7:4:1-7.

  8. EX-HINDU says:


  9. REALITYPLUS says:

    why does anybody trust ANY organized religion. It seems to me that ‘priests’ of every faith use their positions to satisfy their personal lusts, and their need to control others.

    I don’t care which religion you pick. In the US, the Catholics (pedophiles/homosexuals) and the Protestants (incest, pedophilia) are the stars of the show.

    No thanks/

  10. Suprabhat says:

    These comments are not based on any scholarly study of Hindu texts and history but are simply copy-pasted from Paklinks and other such websites who have a herediray agenda to deride everything associated with Hindus and Hinduism. None of the nonsensical practices and events mentioned and connected with Rama, Krishna and others have any reference to support them. If the original authors of this material or their copy-pasters choose to stand by what they have said, it is in line to come forward with supporting references which are authentic and beyond any doubt. It is easy to say that texts may have been modified to suit the needs of Brahmins and then insert any verses which were not there to begin with. Buddhism also was opposed to Hinduism from the beginning so how can one expect it to show Rama and Sita in good light. They created a doubt in minds of people by suggesting that Rama and Sita were an incestuous couple. If anyone cares to see, Buddhism was the first religion to introduce conversions in different countries. When they reached Japan in 7-th 8th centuries they saw that they were following their native religion and it was very difficult to bring them within their fold. Then they devised a Theravada-Buddhism which included elements of native religion as well. Then slowly by canvassing and promotion, discourses people were brought in the fold of Buddhism. To do this, they used to denounce certain key elements of the native religion, and upheld certain others to not make people Too antagonistic and create space to bring them in their fold. after a thousand years of conversion, when the cycle was complete and no one was there to subscribe completely to the native religion, Buddhists were clevere enough to officially close Theravada-Buddhism and merge it with mainstream Buddhism in its orthodox form. This closed the way for people to ever return to their original religion. If one goes by carvings on hindu temples to suggest bestiality and other forms of sex and multiple sex partners as a commonality, most of these depictions were about mythical beings of various orders and it was only meant to show that even with their own unique forms of lifestyle and cultures, they coudl still attain final salvation. It was not meant to glorify sex as a way of life and promote perversions. Of course, much of the evidence available for support of original Hindu texts is lost because of the destruction caused by Muslims and Christians in India for past thousand years. This absence of evidence or “created” absence of evidence is cited as silence of Hinduism on its fallacies and shows that every distortion is part of real Hindu religion. If Islam and Christianity had to undergo atrocities and distortions at the hands of foreign cultures for near to a thousand years, woudl they still be the same? No. It is true that Prajapati or Brahma is said to have done incest with his daughter for 100 years of Brahma inside a sacred lotus even in authentic texts and it is said that from this incest Swayambhuvamanu or the first manu was created who then married his sister Shatrupa as the first human female. However, it is in parallel to a universal occurence of incest as a means of spawning creation and growth of humans in almost every culture of ancient world as well as islam and Christianity. But this does not mean that it can become the representative act in Hinduism in ignorance of everything else.

  11. Trimurti says:


  12. Trimurti says:

    In Hinduism, you take God only as a pretext to fool people, sex, wealth, beauty, sex discrimination, to name only but a few….

    How may of you people have opened the vedas and know exactly what’s written in them ? No, not many hindus but your gurus tell you everything you should know, the rest is kept secret, this is why people in India are the poorest in the world because they believe blindly in their corrupt gurus….

  13. DALIT says:


    Rama treated women with all the severity of the Vedas. As per standard versions of the Ramayana, Rama was 16 years old when she married Sita, and Sita was only 14 years old [ Ram.wh 69 ]. However, these are later, forged versions where the Brahmins have deliberately deleted incriminating passages proving that Rama married Sita when she was 6 years old. As per the oldest extant versions of the Ramayana, namely the Buddhist Ramayana, the marriage was performed as per Manu-Smrti, and Sita was only 6 years old when the lecherous bastard Rama raped her. Marrying a 6 year old baby clearly shows that Ram was not only a rapist and scoundrel to boot but also a child molester.

    ” These items were deleted by the Vaishnava Brahmans in yet another attempt to perpetrate historical fraud. However, the truth has finally been dug out since the Buddhist Ramayana is older than the extant Vaishnava versions, and preserve the facts which were later suppressed by the Aryan Vaishnava fundamentalists. Rama’s dirty laundry has been exposed for all to see. So Rama was, besides being guilty of the mass murder of Sudra Blacks, introducing apartheid and supporting fascism, guilty of incest and child-marriage. ”
    – [ Babu ]

    Many of the real-life passages of Rama’s life are also preserved in the Ravayana, an oral history of the Dalits. This version also accredits Rama with killing his own father. This epitome of a god was nothing but a coward who cut off womens’ noses and murdered his enemies by striking from the back. After he brutally murdered Ravana this traitor burnt the city of Lanka, killing all the thousands of innocent women and children in it. These are only a few of the sadistic crimes against humanity committed by this butcher.

    The main reasons for forming the insidious religion of Brahmanic Hinduism was so that the white male Aryan followers of this religion could satisfy their desires with their own as well as the enslaved black Sudra women. Later the lecherous Brahmin men transformed Vedism into Vaishnavism (which represents 75 % of all `Hindus’) and abrogated to themselves the right to sexual enjouyment of all races, while other men were forbidden access to Brahmin women.
    One of the main examples of this wonderful treatment of aboriginal women is the `great’ God Krishna himself. He raped the Black Sudra women, namely the low-caste cowherdesses or gopis on a massive scale. These ghastly deeds were later distorted into a benign love story by the fraud Brahmins in order to whitewash Krishna’s crimes.


    As proven in the previous chapters the Vedas justity treating a women as nothing but an object for forced labour, child-rearing and fuel for fire or money-making (through Vedic dowry).
    The creator God’s interactions with women, his insatiable lust for lascivious ladies, his lecherous behaviour with his wives and concubines are components that form the model of a true Brahmin. In fact, every Brahmin is said to be a manifestation of Brahma [ cite ] hence they have to follow him in every respect !

    The legend of Brahma and Sarasvati is given in the following Vedic texts
    ( Spellman, p.28 ):

    Aitareya Brahmana.III.33
    Satapatha Brahmana.I.7.4.1ff; XIV, 4.2.1ff;
    Matsya Purana.III.32 ff;
    Bhagavata Purana.III.12.28ff.
    Kovoor has amply summed up the acts of this vile `God’ Brahma, the model for all Hindus :

    ” Brahma is one of the 3 main gods – Trimurti – of the Hindu pantheon.

    He is the creator of the universe. Sarasvati, who became the wife of her own father, was the daughter of Brahma. There are 2 stories about her genesis in the `Saraswati Purana’. One is that Brahma created his beautiful daughter Saraswati direct from his `vital strength’ or seminal fluid. The other is that Brahma used to collect his semen in a pot whenever he masturbated fixing his carnal eyes on the celestial beauty Urvasi. Brahma’s semen in the pot gave birth to the sage Agastya, and Agastya in turn gave birth to Saraswati. Thus, Saraswati had no mother.
    This daughter or grand-daughter of Brahma is the Hindu goddess of learning. When Brahma saw the beauty of Saraswati he became amorous. To escape from her father’s passionate approach Saraswati ran to the lands in all four directions, but she could not escape from her father. She succumbed to Brahma’s wish. Brahma and his daughter Saraswati lived as husband and wife indulging in incest for 100 years. They had a son Swayambhumaru and a daughter Satarupa.
    THrough the incest of Brahma’s son and daughter Brahma got two grandsons and two grand-daughters.”
    [ Kovoor, p.76 ]
    This shows that Brahma considered women merely as objects for sensual fulfullment. Read on about the `greatness’ of these Hindu gods. His constant affairs with women throws light upon his insatiable appetite.
    The Vedas enjoin incest as a kind of marriage. This fact was utilised by Brahma when convincing Sarasvati (also known as Padma) to succumb to his unlimited lust :

    ” 8. On seeing his beautiful daughter Padma, Brahma was sexually excited. He wooed his daughter and wanted to copulate with her. How could a daughter give consent to her own father? Padma refused. Brahma could not give up his desire. He began to quote the Vedas to convince her that there was nothing wrong in having sex with anyone, anytime, anywhere for the sake of giving birth to a child. ”
    – ( Puran )
    This is the Vedic verse Brahma quoted to justify incest :

    Mathara Mupathya, susara Mupatithe, Puthrartheetha.
    Sagamarthi, Napathra loka, nasthee thath.
    Saravam paravo vindu ha, dasmath Puthrar tham.
    Matharam suransathee Rehathee
    - ( Vedas, cited in Puran )

    Translated this verse means
    ” This is the sanskrit sloka Brahma quoted to his daughter. The sacred verse enjoins, that for the sake of a child one can enjoy her own sister or daughter, without any sin attached to it.
    ( Puran )”
    Yet, the Brahmins give some strage `justifications’ for this act, in order to fool the non-Brahmins into practicing incest and destroying their race forever :

    ” Brahma followed Savitri [ Sarasvati ], married her, and they lived together in a lotus for one hundred years. The Purana [ Matsya ] then points out that no question arises regarding prohibited acts of the gods since they do not reap the fruits of their karma (actions) as do mortals. A further justification of Brahma’s action is given by noting that Brahma is the lord of the Vedas and Savitri is the goddess of the Vedas. They therefore are inseparable, and to unite the Vedas with the sacred prayer can surely be no evil.”
    ( Spellman, p.30 )
    Brahma was not satisfied by visiting the many prostitutes and had to marry his own daughter. Incest being sanctioned in the `Holy’ Vedas, she was more than happy to marry her father. What a great father Brahma was, a model for all Brahmin fathers !


    What a fantastic religion indeed ! And in this, Brahma merely served as the role model of the mad, raping Brahmin whose lecherous sexual appetite knew no bounds.

  14. IronFist says:

    A single porki terrorist here posting as “Trimurti’, ‘Reality’, ‘Ex-hindu’, ‘Dalit’ etc., claiming all absurdities from Paki based websites inciting hatred on HIndus.

    Go to hell, moron.

  15. Ah ah ah ah says:


Mauritius Portal Powered by KotZot.