Blogs » Category
Kevin Ramtohul
60-0
Posted April 13, 2010 by Kevin Ramtohul in Society
Potential 60-0. That is the winning spirit. Navin Ramgoolam was right when he declared that l’Alliance de l’Avenir has the potential to win all the seats. Nothing surprising. In Mauritian democracy, this has happened and may also occur again. However, we also know that no battle is won until the last bullet is shot and no election is won until the last ballot is counted.

I am aware that there are many analysts who fight the elections with their laptops. They work out all sorts of scenarios based on data from the Central Statistics Office, the Electoral List and their own campaign teams, studying the list of voters in virtue of their constituency, community, religion, caste, social status and gender. Yet, most of them end up with wrong conclusions. Not to forget the fact that many politicians consult their astrologers. No factor is neglected and politicians try to put all chances on their side. During election time, there is only honey on their tongues and they are immune to criticism.

The May 2010 election is also being organized under the shadow of the verdict of the Privy Council invalidating the election of Ashock Jugnauth in constituency No 8, having found him guilty of corruption. The Prime Minister has given strict instructions to all ministers not to take any step contrary to the electoral law. In fact, the political agents are not seen to be too demanding. I have not seen any ‘base’ being set up nor any show of excess expenditure. The lobbies also are not having their say. Blackmail too will not work this time. Nobody wants to take any risk.

Besides, the short campaign does not leave big margins for the alliance to manoeuvre freely. All they can do is to organize a few congresses and try to contact as many opinion leaders as possible to sway the voters on their side. At first sight, l’Alliance de l’Avenir has a clear advantage. A former leading member of the MMM explaining the 1995 defeat of SAJ revealed that when 2 of 3 of the leading parties come together, the third one is defeated. This scenario was similar with the Labour-MMM alliance against the MSM and MMM-MSM alliance against Labour in 2000. The test was not even different in 2005 when the MSM was split and a fraction led by Anil Baichoo joined the Labour Party to defeat MMM and the remaining MSM.

Everybody is waiting for the final battle line to be drawn with the announcement of the nominees for each constituency. As usual, there is an excess of deserving candidates and many will be left outside the battle ground. Some will rebel, others will go against their party but most of them will fall in line behind their party leader.

The obvious casualty of this election is Rama Sithanen, a brilliant finance minister of MSM and Labour but a very bad party member with an excessive superiority complex. Differences between the Prime Minister and ministers are not new, particularly with the Finance Minister.

An analogy can be made to the conflict between SSR and Sir Veerasamy Ringadoo (SVR). SVR was even designated to succeed SSR and he had even shown his impatience as the old man was not leaving his post and making room for SVR. The latter was on the verge of resigning and parting with SSR when his family and friends prevailed upon him to stay back. SSR and SVR had been closest collaborators and SVR enjoyed his full trust and he accepted to serve the country till the end.

Unfortunately, Rama Sithanen could not abide by party discipline and full proof loyalty to the party leader. Once the alliance had been decided, he ought to have used his closeness to the Prime Minister, the President and Pravind Jugnauth to discuss all issues over a cup of tea and come out as a strong member. His position could have been maintained. The Prime Minister is right when he says that there is no reserved seat or ministry kept for anybody and it is his prerogative to select candidates and appoint ministers. Yet, casualty does exist but it is high time to prepare for the battle of May 5.

On the other hand, all party aspiring to win the election has to put all odds in its favour. Very often, we forget that the battle has to be won constituency by constituency first. There is always the gap between the lip and the cup and the danger of spilling exists. It is the ruling party which faces the bigger challenge and risk. Nobody votes on the basis of past achievements. If it were for the positive ‘bilans,’ none of the ruling parties would have lost elections.

But today, things are different. After successfully gearing the country during the trouble times of the financial crisis, there is need for continuity. Even the leader of the MMM had thought so. For 3 months, he tried to negotiate an alliance with the Labour Party. Of course, no alliance can be done by one party surrendering totally to another. The same applies to the MSM-Labour alliance. Concessions have to be made on all sides. By now, it is evident that the
LP-MSM alliance was the most acceptable one by the respective followers of the parties. It has been found that they are adjusting themselves and forming one team.

A survey of both electorates has shown that a lot of policies have had unpleasant side effects to say the least. The introduction of national residency tax, levying tax on savings, imposing exam fees on students, withdrawal of tax exemptions on borrowings for buildings of houses and other related technical measures that have been detrimental to the middle class, the traditional supporters of Navin Ramgoolam.

Navin Ramgoolam should not ignore these feelings. There is also the unfinished business of the democratization of the economy. Rama Sithanen is perceived as the man who favours the big capital. Once he said that the capitalist should be allowed full freedom to invest and develop. Nothing wrong in the present liberalized world. But this cannot be done against the interest of the small planters and SMEs among others. Nobody is willing to pay enough attention to the plight of the small planters who are on the verge of bankruptcy. It is not by closing the Development Bank of Mauritius that these interests could be served.

The program of the l’Alliance de l’Avenir is to have a large sector of the SMEs and micro-projects to create jobs and opportunities for the new generation, making Mauritius a country of entrepreneurs. In fact, a new twist should be given to the economic policies and the team which is more apt to ensure continual growth and stability will be the winner.

In my opinion, l’Alliance de l’Avenir symbolizes unity and stability and Navin Ramgoolam is more apt to ensure development of the country. Another danger facing the campaign manager is to avoid cross voting and ensure bloc voting. Absenteeism is another enemy. General mobilization should be planned to bring the voter to the polling station to ensure victory.
Neelam
Women in Politics
Posted March 20, 2010 by Neelam in Society
Is one in three the way towards emancipation? Our guests look at the question from various angles.

And it is solely because I respect you immensely that I do not believe that quotas are needed for you to prove to the masses that there should be more women in parliamentarian positions... provided they are competent. As a firm proponent of equal opportunities, I am in favour of choosing the best candidates irrespective of caste, creed, colour and gender and thus firmly against any system of seat allocation on criteria other than merit.

Le vrai débat de fond that would have been of interest to voters, instead of the petitioning for one out of three candidates in constituencies, would center around the betterment of the lives of Mauritian women in society. How, in a non- demagogic way, we would fi nd ways to provide protection to women from falling prey to humiliation of any type that would encompass the inequality of pay, the poor treatment of women in some communities, or sexual predation of any kind. All of these real issues have been forgotten, sacrifi ced I dare say, on the altar of gender equality for the selfi sh needs of a few.

Global female representation in politics stands at a low 18%. Shares have been introduced in a number of countries across the world and have taken the forms of voluntary, constitutionally guaranteed ones and reserved seats. The results? Mixed.

Legislators in Rwanda saw in quotas a formidable way of ensuring that women, who had been heavily victimised during the genocide, would be given the needed aid to ensure that they would play a greater role in the Rwandan society and help soothe some of the great pain that had been caused to them.

Albeit Rwanda, where there were pressing needs to be dealt with, the imposition of quotas has not been commensurate with the greater emancipation of women in these societies. Has this rationing helped in altering the lives of women in other legislations for the better? I doubt it. Did Indira Gandhi’s Prime Ministership create greater equilibrium between genders in India? Certainly not.

A number of reasons could logically be drawn against quotas. Besides fl outing the very pillars of equal opportunities, they cast doubts on the mettle of those women chosen. Yes, Mauritian politics remains a male citadel but this bastion can be broken by encouraging more competent women to make their voices heard in the political cauldron. Before I get assailed with accusations that I am leaving the fairer sex in an unwinnable battle, let me reassure you, it is as diffi cult and even more so for an opinionated male member to be heeded on issues such as political fi nancing or corruption in any of the leading parties in Mauritius.

Simplistic solutions offered to a most pertinent issue, but truth be told, this has all been part of the Mauritian pre- elections landscape for long. Offering rabble- rousers supremacy above thinkers and allowing those with egotistical motives to impose themselves on other grounds than competence.

The one out of three candidates per constituency campaigners would no doubt enhance their credibility with additional information on why should this be done with details on how it will improve the lives of women in the Mauritius.

Let this show médiatique be replaced by more thought provoking debates. Absit invidia.

Allowing those with egotistical motives to impose themselves on other grounds than competence.
Neelam
Corporate Social Obligation
Posted March 15, 2010 by Neelam in Society
In this time of deep global crisis, the Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Rama Sithanen, feels employment preservation should be the main focus of employers. He calls for a turn from Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Social Obligation to preserve maximum jobs.

He lays stress on the importance of adopting a united, social and responsible approach towards employment.
“We are not telling enterprises not to lay off their employees but as they have made profit in the past, today it is more important for companies to have a responsible
social approach towards job preservation. Laying off people should be the last recourse. We need lucidity in our actions. Now is not the time to fight and panic. Economic estimations are very difficult because of the fast changing situation,” he says.

Sithanen adds: “ We are not immune and isolated to the global problems which have affected to some extent the FDI flow in the country but initiating the additional stimulus package even before recession has been a positive measure. Mauritius' economy has to prepare to bounce back as soon as the recession is over,” he said.
To be a Mauritian is not to be mistaken for a Mauritanian! Yet, not long ago, a letter despatched from a foreign country was received at the State House, Le Réduit, in the name of the then President of the Republic and where Mauritius was labelled as the Islamic Republic of Mauritania. A precious piece for the Presidency’s Archives! In spite of the numerous awareness and promotion campaigns, in a bid to attract more investors and tourists, Mauritius still remains a largely and despairingly unknown country, in many parts of the world.

If you fail to recognise the country you can equally and more easily fail to recognise the Mauritian in a crowd. There is nothing distinctive about his physique or his features. He is not of any specific, identifiable type. He is of different types. He is not of one ethnic group. He is of several different ethnic groups. He is often mistaken for a European, an Indian, a Pakistani, a Bangladeshi, a Chinese, a Mozambican, a Malagasi, a coloured South African, an Omani, a Brazilian... After all, our ancestors came from all over the world, at different periods, to settle in the desert island that used to be known as Mauritius under Dutch occupation, Isle de France under French colonisation and again Mauritius since the British took over the island in 1810. Yet, nothing can be more frustrating than being mistaken for the national of another country or having to give a whole lesson of geography and history to identify our country, its location and its people: it’s like being reduced almost to a stateless individual! 42 years since we are independent, including the 18 years since we acceded to the status of a Republic, and we are still in the process of nation building. We are still a nation in the making. It is therefore not surprising that our national identity is generally weak and that factors like religious, caste and cultural affiliations still play a prominent role in our private and public life and influence our behaviour patterns. We tend, at various degrees, to develop parochial attitudes that do not make for strong and abiding social cohesion.

Yet, we share a number of common characteristics and these, I believe, can best describe what and who is a Mauritian.

We have a language of our own, a common language used and understood by everybody: the Mauritian language.

It has for a long time been considered and treated as a dialect, even despised in certain milieu, utilised orally and for communication purposes only. In recent years, however, it has graduated into a full- fl edged language when more and more authors started expressing themselves in it. Today, every Mauritian is proud of his language that binds him to his fellow citizens and constitutes his fi rst and main identity.

The sega – a rhythmic music and song often accompanied by lascivious dance – reminiscent of our African origin, is generally accepted as a typical Mauritian folklore. Mauritians are said to have the sega in their blood! The Mauritian is a multi- cultural individual, a cultural half- caste or métis. Labouring under various cultural infl uences since his childhood, he is neither totally European, nor Asian, nor African but a mix of all of them. Wearing with equal ease shirts or kurtas, skirts or saris, taking pleasure in watching Indian movies, Chinese documentaries and American clips, the average Mauritian who is trilingual, expresses himself equally well in English and French communicating with his other compatriots in the Mauritian language and not unusually in an Indian language – Bhojpuri, Hindi, Urdu... Characterised by the warmth of his welcome and the generosity of his hospitality, especially towards foreigners, the Mauritian receives his guests with meals from a diversity of cuisines.

However, what stands out as our typical local dish is the rougaille, prepared with tomatoes, onions and other spicy ingredients, which is neither the European sauce rouge nor the Indian tomato sauce.

The Briani, an Indian dish, made of rice, potatoes, meat and several other ingredients cooked together, has become almost our national dish, fi t for all occasions and relished by all.

A typical Mauritian is a tolerant individual, respectful of his neighbours’ religious beliefs and way of life. His high level of tolerance quotient allows him to make a lot of allowances, at times even to the detriment of his own personal convenience.

He always tries to show understanding and to accommodate others. This is probably the result of his upbringing and education since early childhood but also the democratic nature of the society that makes of the Mauritian a democrat or a basically democracy- lover. He believes in freedom of religion, expression and association. He learns to be a magnanimous winner and a good loser.

What has been described herein is the typical Mauritian not the ideal one. Obviously, there are, as the case is everywhere else, a number of Mauritians whose behaviour reflects the undercurrent of suspicions and hypocrisy that, to some extent, still exists between the various cultural groups. Some have even cultivated the racial stereotypes and prefer to operate within their small closed society but by and large the Mauritian is “ un être de dialogue et d’ouverture’.
Will the Prime Minister have the guts to re-introduce capital punishment to stem the wave of crime and violence in the country and bail out our society from the scourge of drugs? It is true that today there are two cancers which are gnawing away at our society? namely the insecurity and the proliferation of drugs in the country. In its last annual report of the International Narcotics Control Board in Austria, Mauritius is cited as a platform for drug-trafficking in the Indian Ocean.

Subutex came to the drug-market in 1999 and since then it has overrun the country to the extent that it has become an easy commodity on the market.

Law and Order has taken a turn for the worse. Never has the country witnessed such an upswing in crime and violence which have become daily occurrences. Today people are killed for a mere argument. The killers kill without any after-thought for the consequences of their acts. There is a growing fear of insecurity in the country. Today people have to be on their guard wherever they are. There are places where it is advisable not to venture to avoid unnecessary trouble. You have to be prudent when using your mobile because at any time it can be wrenched from your hand. And any resistance on your part, you are slashed mercilessly with a knife or a cutter. The taxi-stands are deserted after six in the evening because the security of the taxi-drivers is not guaranteed. It is risky to drive even your own car at night unless there is an urgency. And this you have to be cautious where you drive to avoid being the target of wrongdoers. We are becoming like South Africa where walking with a gold necklace round your neck has become synonymous with courting death. This is Mauritius today! "L'île Maurice durable, C'est un plaisir!" They say.

Recently a French couple who were having their holidays at Grand Baie said that Mauritius has become a country where there is no security. A country where its tourist industry is churning out billions of rupees, the tourists are at risk when they leave their hotels. How many foreign visitors have had their holidays turned into a nightmare and had returned to their country with a sour remembrance of their stay in Mauritius.

The Bulwark of Society

Each time a girl is raped, a tourist is robbed, a heinous crime is committed, we have the feeling that our law is not severe enough to deter wrongdoers. The Country lacks an effective deterrent to check the wave of crime, banditry and violence. Law and order is the foundation of all civilized society. They are the under-pinnings of all socio-economic development of a country. A country which hinges heavily on tourism for its economy, like ours cannot afford to have a lax law and order. They can do an untold harm to that industry and dent the image of the country as a tourist resort. A country which is bankrupt of law and order is prone to all sorts of ills and evils. Law which is the bulwark of the society should be stringent to deter all wrongdoings to ensure the security and order of its citizens. In the absence of a rigid law, we shall have an unlivable society.

Apparently Navin Ramgoolam has been intelligently briefed by his Intelligence Service regarding the prevailing situation in the country about law and order and what is on the lips of the people concerning their security. There is a strong current outside for the re-introduction of capital punishment to check the wave of crime and violence, and to beat down the insecurity in the country.

Vox populi_


This is the Vox Pop which every caring government should take into account. If we go round the country collecting the vox pops regarding the re-introduction of death penalty, I am convinced that the majority of the people will be agreeable with the decision of the Prime Minister to re-introduce death penalty. After all who is that Mauritian who does not like his security?

If the Prime Minister sticks to his decision to re-introduce Capital Punishment and makes it his electoral plank for the General Elections, he will reap fabulous dividends. The electorate will vote massively for his party. But he should be adamant in his decision. He should not listen to Mr. Crown, Mrs. Jewel or this or that organisation. Let them bark. If you succeed in giving your country law and order, and security for all your people, along with a fair and equitable distribution of the country's wealth, you will go down in history as the Lee Kuan Yew of your country. You will make Mauritius the Singapore of the Indian Ocean where your people will move around without having to look over their shoulders and where your country will no longer be cited in International press as "Maurice plaque tournante du trafic de drogue dans L'OI." Because the wealth and economy of a country should be cheek to jowl with its law and order and security. Otherwise where is the fun of having a car if I cannot drive it in security at night?

The re-introduction of capital punishment in itself is an effective deterrent to would-be criminals and drug-traffickers. Death penalty will make the killers think twice before they perform their sordid tasks, knowing that all crime with premeditation will be treated with the utmost rigour of the law. And the drug-traffickers, knowing that death penalty is in store for them if they are caught with drug in their possession will no doubt seek other destination for their goods.

It is like having a doberman in your yard. The very presence of that fierce dog is solid deterrent in itself. It is needless for it to bark and bite. Its very presence at your place discourages robbers and keeps down the rate of robbery. It helps you to live in peace and sleep at night.

Just imagine if man had not invented nuclear bombs, the world would have already known its third or fourth world war. Nuclear weapons are an effective deterrent to a worldwide conflict and a watchdog for peace. So go ahead with your decision, Monsieur, Le Premier Ministre.
Displaying 1 to 5 of 8